Opinion
05-22-00667-CV
04-12-2023
EVANGELINA REYES, Appellant v. JOSE TINAJERO, A BETTER PLACE LLC, Appellee
On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-02212
Before Justices Molberg, Carlyle, and Smith
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CRAIG SMITH JUSTICE
After appellant failed to respond to our inquiry regarding the reporter's record, we ordered the appeal submitted without a reporter's record. Following four extensions of time to file her brief, appellant filed a brief on February 3, 2023. On February 9, 2023, we notified appellant, who is proceeding pro se, that her brief failed to comply with rule 38.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1. We listed numerous defects in the brief, including that it did not contain a table of contents, a statement of the case, or list the issues for review. Further, no part of the brief contained any citations to the record and the brief did not list or cite to any authorities. We instructed appellant to file an amended brief correcting these deficiencies within ten days. We later extended the time to file her amended brief and sent appellant a copy of the clerk's record on February 22, 2023. On March 14, 2022, we denied appellant's March 13, 2023 second request to extend time to file her amended brief. In that order, we cautioned appellant that her brief remained due on March 15, 2023 and that the appeal remained subject to dismissal if she failed to file an amended brief. To date, appellant has not filed an amended brief nor otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.
Even liberally construing appellant's February 3, 2023 brief, we conclude it is wholly inadequate to present any questions for appellate review and is in flagrant violation of rule 38.1. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1; Bolling v. Farmers Branch Indep. Sch. Dist., 315 S.W.3d 893, 895 (Tex. App-Dallas 2010, no pet.). Further, although directed to do so, appellant has failed to file an amended brief correcting the briefing deficiencies. Under these circumstances, we strike appellant's February 3, 2023 brief and dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9(a); 42.3(b),(c).
JUDGMENT
In accordance with this Court's opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.