From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reyes v. Esquilin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 23, 2008
54 A.D.3d 615 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

September 23, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dianne T. Renwick, J.), entered July 5, 2007, which granted defendants' motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint for lack of a serious injury as required by Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Lippman, P.J., Tom, Williams, McGuire and Freedman, JJ.


Plaintiff failed to present objective medical evidence responsive to defendants' showing that the MRIs of plaintiff taken shortly after the accident revealed only age-related degenerative changes, not any sudden trauma that can be causally related to the accident ( see Pommells v Perez, 4 NY3d 566, 579; Ronda v Friendly Baptist Church, 52 AD3d 440; Becerril v Sol Cab Corp., 50 AD3d 261). Absent such evidence, it does not avail plaintiffs 90/180-day claim that defendants' experts did not address his condition during the relevant period of time ( see Blackwell v Fraser, 13 AD3d 157, 157; cf. Webb v Johnson, 13 AD3d 54, 55).


Summaries of

Reyes v. Esquilin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 23, 2008
54 A.D.3d 615 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Reyes v. Esquilin

Case Details

Full title:FELIX REYES, Appellant, v. JOSE M. ESQUILIN, Respondent, et al., Defendants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 23, 2008

Citations

54 A.D.3d 615 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
866 N.Y.S.2d 4

Citing Cases

Hosen v. Eglise Baptiste Calvaire Int'l

Nor does Dr. Berkowitz provide objective medical evidence that the injuries are not degenerative. See Reyes…

Viruet v. Am. United Transp. Inc.

Minor limitations of movement in a plaintiff's neck and back are insufficient to be considered a serious…