Summary
finding no error where the ALJ did not fully adopt the RFC determination of the state agency review physician, but, instead, "synthesized the findings, examined the medical records from the relevant time period, considered [the claimant's] subjective complaints, and rendered a detailed RFC determination"
Summary of this case from Blaisdell v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.Opinion
3:09-CV-0285 (LEK/VEB).
February 26, 2010
DECISION AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on February 10, 2010 by the Honorable Victor E. Bianchini, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3 of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 13). After ten days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the entire file to the undersigned, including the objections by Plaintiff Susan H. Reyes, which were filed on February 12, 2010. Objections (Dkt. No. 14).
It is the duty of this Court to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). "A [district] judge . . . may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." Id. This Court has considered the objections and has undertaken a de novo review of the record and has determined that the Report-Recommendation should be approved for the reasons stated therein.
The Court, therefore, remands Plaintiff's case for further proceedings in accordance with this Decision and Order.
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 13) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further
ORDERED, that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED, that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is DENIED, and that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.
IT IS SO ORDERED.