From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reyes v. Adams

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 21, 2010
CV 06-3621-ODW (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 21, 2010)

Opinion


MARK ANTHONY REYES, Petitioner, v. DARREL ADAMS, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 06-3621-ODW (JEM). United States District Court, C.D. California. June 21, 2010.

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          OTIS D. WRIGHT, II District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 638, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the Court has made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court concurs with and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that judgment be entered denying the Second Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and dismissing this action with prejudice.


Summaries of

Reyes v. Adams

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 21, 2010
CV 06-3621-ODW (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 21, 2010)
Case details for

Reyes v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:MARK ANTHONY REYES, Petitioner, v. DARREL ADAMS, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jun 21, 2010

Citations

CV 06-3621-ODW (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 21, 2010)