From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reybol v. U.S. Mint

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 22, 2024
23-cv-06002-MMC (N.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-06002-MMC

02-22-2024

ARCELIO JOSEPH REYBOL, Plaintiff, v. U.S. MINT, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

MARINE M. CHESNEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is Chief Magistrate Judge Donna Ryu's Report and Recommendation, filed January 25, 2024, whereby said Magistrate Judge recommends the Court dismiss the above-titled action without prejudice for failure to prosecute, namely, plaintiff's failure to comply with an order directing him to either file, no later than January 18, 2024, a complete in forma pauperis application or pay the filing fee by that date.

In apparent response to the Report and Recommendation, plaintiff, who proceeds pro se, filed on January 30, 2024, a document titled "Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 7(a) IFP Application Answer/Summons," which document, despite its title, does not constitute an in forma pauperis application, and the record indicates plaintiff has not otherwise filed a complete in forma pauperis application or paid the filing fee at any time.

Accordingly, the Court having reviewed the record de novo, the Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED in its entirety, and the above-titled action is hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Reybol v. U.S. Mint

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 22, 2024
23-cv-06002-MMC (N.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Reybol v. U.S. Mint

Case Details

Full title:ARCELIO JOSEPH REYBOL, Plaintiff, v. U.S. MINT, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Feb 22, 2024

Citations

23-cv-06002-MMC (N.D. Cal. Feb. 22, 2024)