From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reybol v. Plasma

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 12, 2024
23-cv-05924-AMO (N.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-05924-AMO

01-12-2024

ARCELIO JOSEPH REYBOL, Plaintiff, v. OCTAPHARMA PLASMA, Defendant.


ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE

ARACELI MARTÍNEZ-OLGUÍN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On November 16, 2023, pro se plaintiff Arcelio Joseph Reybol filed a complaint, ECF 1, along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), ECF 2. On November 20, 2023, the Court denied the application and directed Reybol to submit a revised application or pay the filing fee by no later than December 15, 2023. To date, Reybol has not submitted a revised application or paid the filing fee. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDCE to Reybol filing a request to reopen. Any such request must be accompanied by payment of the filing fee or a properly completed IFP application. The Clerk shall close the file in this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Reybol v. Plasma

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 12, 2024
23-cv-05924-AMO (N.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2024)
Case details for

Reybol v. Plasma

Case Details

Full title:ARCELIO JOSEPH REYBOL, Plaintiff, v. OCTAPHARMA PLASMA, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 12, 2024

Citations

23-cv-05924-AMO (N.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2024)