From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reybol v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 9, 2024
23-cv-05546-SK (N.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-05546-SK

01-09-2024

ARCELIO JOSEPH REYBOL, Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

SALLIE KIM United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff filed the complaint in this matter on October 27, 2023. (Dkt. No. 1.) Plaintiff has taken no further action since. The Court has a full case load and does not have the time to manage this case for Plaintiff. Plaintiff must prosecute this case diligently. Accordingly, Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED to Show Cause in writing by no later than January 26, 2024, why the Court should not issue a report and recommendation to a District Judge recommending that this case should be dismissed for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Plaintiff is admonished that if no response is filed by this deadline, the Court will issue the report and recommendation without further notice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Reybol v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 9, 2024
23-cv-05546-SK (N.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2024)
Case details for

Reybol v. JPMorgan Chase Bank

Case Details

Full title:ARCELIO JOSEPH REYBOL, Plaintiff, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 9, 2024

Citations

23-cv-05546-SK (N.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2024)