Rey v. State

13 Citing cases

  1. Christian v. State

    Case No. 5D18-2669 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jan. 18, 2019)

    However, we remand for the entry of a proper written order revoking Appellant's community control that specifies the conditions of community control that Appellant was found to have violated. Cf. Rey v. State, 904 So. 2d 566, 566 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (remanding "for entry of a written order of revocation of probation specifying the conditions [of probation] appellant was found to have violated"). AFFIRMED; REMANDED for entry of written order of revocation of community control.

  2. Craig v. State

    249 So. 3d 779 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

    We affirm in this Anders appeal of the trial court’s disposition of appellant’s violation of probation proceeding, but remand for entry of a written order of revocation of probation specifying the conditions appellant was found to have violated. SeeBrown v. State , 82 So.3d 910 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) ; Rey v. State , 904 So.2d 566 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), Riley v. State , 884 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). Damoorgian, Levine and Klingensmith, JJ., concur.

  3. Clark v. State

    201 So. 3d 799 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)   Cited 3 times

    We affirm this Anders appeal of the trial court's disposition of appellant's violation of probation proceeding, but remand for entry of a written order of revocation of probation specifying the conditions appellant was found to have violated. See Brown v. State, 82 So.3d 910 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) ; Rey v. State, 904 So.2d 566 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), Riley v. State, 884 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). We recognize that the judge specified those conditions on the record, but a written order is required to incorporate those findings.

  4. Brown v. State

    Nos. 4D10-262, 4D10-263 and 4D10-264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Jun. 29, 2011)

    We affirm, but remand for the trial court to enter a written order of revocation of probation specifying the conditions appellant was found to have violated. See Rey v. State, 904 So. 2d 566 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). Affirmed; Remanded with Instructions.

  5. Smith v. State

    6 So. 3d 116 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009)   Cited 4 times

    We remand for entry of a written order of revocation of probation specifying the conditions appellant was found to have violated. Mills v. State, 948 So.2d 994 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); see also Cook v. State, 993 So.2d 1186 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Rey v. State, 904 So.2d 566 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); Riley v. State, 884 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). We note that the judge specified the conditions on the record, but a written order is required to incorporate those findings.

  6. Garrett v. State

    995 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

    However, we remand for entry of a written order of revocation of probation specifying the conditions appellant was found to have violated. See Petrie v. State, 980 So.2d 1209 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Rey v. State, 904 So.2d 566 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); Riley v. State, 884 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Anderson v. State, 879 So.2d 688 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Campbell v. State, 776 So.2d 1036 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). KLEIN, GROSS and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

  7. Petrie v. State

    980 So. 2d 1209 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 6 times

    In this Anders appeal, we affirm the order revoking appellant's probation and imposing sentence, but we remand for entry of a written order of revocation of probation specifying the conditions appellant was found to have violated. See Rey v. State, 904 So.2d 566 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); Riley v. State, 884 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Anderson v. State, 879 So.2d 688 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); Campbell v. State, 776 So.2d 1036 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493(1967).

  8. Harbeson v. State

    964 So. 2d 809 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

    In this Anders appeal, we affirm the order revoking Harbeson's probation and imposing sentence, but we remand for entry of a written order of revocation of probation specifying the conditions appellant was found to have violated. See Mills v. State, 948 So.2d 994 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Rey v. State, 904 So.2d 566 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005), Riley v. State, 884 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), Anderson v. State, 879 So.2d 688 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), Campbell v. State, 776 So.2d 1036 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), Greene v. State, 919 So.2d 684 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). We note that the judge specified those conditions on the record, but a written order is required to incorporate those findings.

  9. Smith v. State

    962 So. 2d 380 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 3 times

    We affirm the order revoking appellant's probation and imposing sentence, but we remand for entry of a written order of revocation of probation specifying the conditions appellant was found to have violated. See Mills v. State, 948 So.2d 994 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Rey v. State, 904 So.2d 566 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); Riley v. State, 884 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

  10. Peterson v. State

    962 So. 2d 367 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 2 times

    We remand the case to allow the trial court to enter the written order. See Rey v. State, 904 So.2d 566 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) ("remanding for entry of a written order of revocation of probation specifying the conditions appellant was found to have violated"). Next we turn to Peterson's contention that the trial court erred in adding points to his original sentencing scoresheet.