From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Revels v. S.C. Dep't of Emp't & Workforce

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jan 14, 2015
Appellate Case No. 2013-002744 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 14, 2015)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2013-002744 Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-011

01-14-2015

Timothy D. Revels, Appellant, v. South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce and Sherman College of Chiropractic, Respondents.

Scott Franklin Talley, of Talley Law Firm, P.A., of Spartanburg, for Appellant. Michael Brian Magargle, of Constangy Brooks & Smith, LLP, of Columbia, for Respondent Sherman College of Chiropractic; and Maura Dawson Baker, of the South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce, of Columbia, for Respondent South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From The Administrative Law Court
Deborah Brooks Durden, Administrative Law Judge

AFFIRMED

Scott Franklin Talley, of Talley Law Firm, P.A., of Spartanburg, for Appellant. Michael Brian Magargle, of Constangy Brooks & Smith, LLP, of Columbia, for Respondent Sherman College of Chiropractic; and Maura Dawson Baker, of the South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce, of Columbia, for Respondent South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce. PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: S.C. Code Ann. § 41-35-750 (Supp. 2013) ("Within thirty days from the date of mailing the [South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce's (SCDEW's)] decision, a party to the proceeding whose benefit rights or whose employer account may be affected by the [SCDEW's] decision may initiate an action in the administrative law court against the [SCDEW] for the review of its decision, in which action every other party to the proceeding before the [SCDEW] must be made a defendant."); Rule 33, SCALCR ("The notice of appeal from the final decision of an agency shall be filed with the Court and a copy served on each party and the agency whose final decision is the subject of the appeal within thirty (30) days of receipt of the decision from which the appeal is taken. In appeals from decisions of the [SCDEW], the notice of appeal must be filed and served within thirty (30) days of the date of the decision of the [SCDEW] Appellate Panel."); Elam v. S.C. Dep't of Transp., 361 S.C. 9, 14-15, 602 S.E.2d 772, 775 (2004) ("The requirement of service of the notice of appeal is jurisdictional, i.e., if a party misses the deadline, the appellate court lacks jurisdiction to consider the appeal and has no authority or discretion to 'rescue' the delinquent party by extending or ignoring the deadline for service of the notice."); Allison v. W.L. Gore & Assocs., 394 S.C. 185, 189, 714 S.E.2d 547, 550 (2011) (stating "an appellate body may not extend the time to appeal"). AFFIRMED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

FEW, C.J., and THOMAS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Revels v. S.C. Dep't of Emp't & Workforce

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Jan 14, 2015
Appellate Case No. 2013-002744 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 14, 2015)
Case details for

Revels v. S.C. Dep't of Emp't & Workforce

Case Details

Full title:Timothy D. Revels, Appellant, v. South Carolina Department of Employment…

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 14, 2015

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2013-002744 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 14, 2015)