From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Retutal v. Retutal

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Sep 22, 2014
SCWC-10-0000126 (Haw. Sep. 22, 2014)

Opinion

SCWC-10-0000126

09-22-2014

JAMES LAURETA RETUTAL, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SARAH KAMAILE RETUTAL, now known as Hatori, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.

Scot Stuart Brower for petitioner


CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(CAAP-10-0000126; FC-D NO. 09-1-1130)
ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
()

It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above-referenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate Court of Appeals at the time the application for writ of certiorari was filed, see Hawai'i Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) (Supp. 2013); see also Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 36(b)(1) (2012),

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's application for writ of certiorari, filed September 16, 2014, is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the application pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2014) ("The application shall be filed within thirty days after the filing of the intermediate court of appeals' judgment on appeal or dismissal order, unless the time for filing the application is extended in accordance with this rule.").

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, September 22, 2014. Scot Stuart Brower for petitioner

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson


Summaries of

Retutal v. Retutal

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
Sep 22, 2014
SCWC-10-0000126 (Haw. Sep. 22, 2014)
Case details for

Retutal v. Retutal

Case Details

Full title:JAMES LAURETA RETUTAL, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SARAH KAMAILE…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

Date published: Sep 22, 2014

Citations

SCWC-10-0000126 (Haw. Sep. 22, 2014)