From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reszutek v. United States

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jan 31, 1945
147 F.2d 142 (2d Cir. 1945)

Opinion

No. 215.

January 31, 1945.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.

Proceeding between Joseph Reszutek and the United States of America. From an order denying a motion to suppress evidence, Joseph Reszutek appeals.

Affirmed.

Morris E. Packer, of Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant.

Vine H. Smith, Asst. U.S. Atty. of Brooklyn, N.Y. (T. Vincent Quinn, U.S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N.Y., on the brief), for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, SIMONS, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.


While the extent of an agent's legal authority to consent to a search and seizure may often be a matter of grave dispute, we think a showing of consent by those admittedly "in charge" of a six-family house as "superintendents" to a search of the cellar was sufficient to justify the District Court in entering an order denying the owner's motion to suppress evidence so obtained "without prejudice to a renewal thereof before the Trial Court." See Raine v. United States, 9 Cir., 299 F. 407, 411, certiorari denied 266 U.S. 611, 45 S.Ct. 94, 69 L.Ed. 467; United States v. Antonelli Fireworks Co., D.C.W.D.N.Y., 53 F. Supp. 870, 874; United States v. Ruffner, D.C.Md., 51 F.2d 579; United States v. Sergio, D.C.E.D.N.Y., 21 F. Supp. 553; United States v. Thomson, 7 Cir., 113 F.2d 643, 644, 129 A.L.R. 1291; State v. Griswold, 67 Conn. 290, 34 A. 1046, 33 L.R.A. 227. Moreover, the papers show an issue, raised by the superintendent at the time of search, and later in an affidavit presented by petitioner, that the particular spot where alcohol was found was in the possession not of the owner, but of a tenant. United States v. Ebeling, 2 Cir., 146 F.2d 254, and cases cited; Matthews v. Correa, 2 Cir., 135 F.2d 534, 537; Schnitzer v. United States, 8 Cir., 77 F.2d 233, 235. Petitioner appears to have been content to rely upon affidavits; if, however, he has additional facts to offer, the opportunity given him to renew his motion at trial, should one be had, affords him ample protection. Matthews v. Correa, supra.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Reszutek v. United States

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jan 31, 1945
147 F.2d 142 (2d Cir. 1945)
Case details for

Reszutek v. United States

Case Details

Full title:RESZUTEK v. UNITED STATES

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Jan 31, 1945

Citations

147 F.2d 142 (2d Cir. 1945)

Citing Cases

United States v. Kupper

This Court agrees that such search and seizure does not violate the 4th Amendment to the Constitution of the…

United States v. Heine

Nor does the record support the claim that this evidence was taken from defendant's home without consent or…