From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

RESNER v. ARC MILLS, INC

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Apr 20, 1998
152 F.3d 920 (2d Cir. 1998)

Summary

holding that, in order to state a discrimination claim under ERISA, plaintiff must first establish a prima facie case by demonstrating that she was a member of the protected class, qualified for her job and discharged under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination

Summary of this case from FEHN v. GR. LG. TERM DISABILITY PLAN

Opinion

No. 97-7981.

April 20, 1998.

Appeal from the S.D.N.Y.


Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.


Summaries of

RESNER v. ARC MILLS, INC

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Apr 20, 1998
152 F.3d 920 (2d Cir. 1998)

holding that, in order to state a discrimination claim under ERISA, plaintiff must first establish a prima facie case by demonstrating that she was a member of the protected class, qualified for her job and discharged under circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination

Summary of this case from FEHN v. GR. LG. TERM DISABILITY PLAN
Case details for

RESNER v. ARC MILLS, INC

Case Details

Full title:RESNER v. ARC MILLS, INC

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Apr 20, 1998

Citations

152 F.3d 920 (2d Cir. 1998)

Citing Cases

Mayers v. Emigrant Bancorp, Inc.

Dister v. Cont'l Grp., Inc., 859 F.2d at 1111–12 (“Employers of a mind to act contrary to law seldom note…

FEHN v. GR. LG. TERM DISABILITY PLAN

To assert a claim of retaliation under section 510, plaintiff would have to establish that: (1) she was…