From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Resh v. Resh

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jan 17, 1929
144 A. 361 (Md. 1929)

Opinion

[No. 77, October Term, 1928.]

Decided January 17th, 1929.

Divorce — Adultery.

Evidence held insufficient to establish adultery on defendant's part.

Decided January 17th, 1929.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City (O'DUNNE, J.).

Bill by James Edwin Resh against Mary Linnie Resh. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

The cause was argued before BOND, C.J., URNER, OFFUTT, DIGGES, PARK, and SLOAN, JJ.

J. Britain Winter, for the appellant.

J. Charles Fagan submitting on brief, for the appellee.


Unreported cases.


Summaries of

Resh v. Resh

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jan 17, 1929
144 A. 361 (Md. 1929)
Case details for

Resh v. Resh

Case Details

Full title:JAMES EDWIN RESH v . MARY LINNIE RESH

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Jan 17, 1929

Citations

144 A. 361 (Md. 1929)
156 Md. 699

Citing Cases

Steinla v. Steinla

It need not be proved beyond a reasonable doubt, except where it is the subject of a criminal prosecution,…