From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Resendiz v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston
Dec 16, 2010
No. 14-10-01165-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 16, 2010)

Opinion

No. 14-10-01165-CR

Opinion filed December 16, 2010. DO NOT PUBLISH — TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

On Appeal from the 337th District Court, Harris County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 1204923.

Panel consists of Chief Justice HEDGES and Justices YATES and JAMISON.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Appellant entered a plea of guilty to aggravated assault on a family member. Appellant and the State agreed that appellant's punishment would not exceed confinement in prison for more than fifteen years. In accordance with the terms of this agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant on October 14, 2010, to confinement for twelve years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a timely, written notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal. The trial court entered a certification of the defendant's right to appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case and the defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). An agreement that places a cap on punishment is a plea bargain for purposes of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2). Waters v. State, 124 S.W.3d 825, 826-27 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2003, pet. ref'd) (holding reviewing court lacked jurisdiction where defendant pled guilty with a sentencing cap of ten years, even though trial judge mistakenly certified defendant had right of appeal); Threadgill v. State, 120 S.W.3d 871, 872 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, no. pet.) (holding statement in record indicating that there was no agreed recommendation did not convert proceeding into an open plea where plea was entered pursuant to agreed sentencing cap); see also Shankle v. State, 119 S.W.3d 808, 813 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (stating sentence-bargaining may be for recommendations to the court on sentences, including a recommended "cap" on sentencing). The trial court's certification is included in the record on appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record supports the trial court's certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.


Summaries of

Resendiz v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston
Dec 16, 2010
No. 14-10-01165-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 16, 2010)
Case details for

Resendiz v. State

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS ALBERTO RESENDIZ, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District, Houston

Date published: Dec 16, 2010

Citations

No. 14-10-01165-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 16, 2010)