From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

REPA v. REECE MASONRY

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Nov 8, 2011
No. ED96616 (Mo. Ct. App. Nov. 8, 2011)

Opinion

No. ED96616

November 8, 2011

Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission 11-01114.

Alec D. Repa Appellant Acting Pro Se, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Reece Masonry, Inc., Respondent Acting Pro Se, Wentzville, MO, Division of Employment Security, Bart Anton Matanic, Attorney for Respondent, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Sherri B. Sullivan, J.



ORDER


Alec D. Repa appeals from a decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying him unemployment benefits. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. The Commission's decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

REPA v. REECE MASONRY

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Nov 8, 2011
No. ED96616 (Mo. Ct. App. Nov. 8, 2011)
Case details for

REPA v. REECE MASONRY

Case Details

Full title:ALEC D. REPA, Claimant/Appellant, v. REECE MASONRY, INC.…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Nov 8, 2011

Citations

No. ED96616 (Mo. Ct. App. Nov. 8, 2011)