From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District
May 23, 2011
20 A.3d 1187 (Pa. 2011)

Opinion

Nos. 672 WAL 2010, 675 WAL 2010.

May 23, 2011.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as phrased by petitioners, are:

1. Did the Superior Court err in its determination that the assertion of highly reckless conduct is an affirmative defense contrary to prior decisions of this Court and of the Superior Court which classify such assertion as a denial of causation?

2. Did the Superior Court err in its determination to expand the requirements for proof of highly reckless conduct in contravention of prior decisions of that same [c]ourt?


Summaries of

Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District
May 23, 2011
20 A.3d 1187 (Pa. 2011)
Case details for

Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DUANE REOTT AND PATTY REOTT, HUSBAND AND WIFE v. ASIA TREND, INC., CLAM…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Western District

Date published: May 23, 2011

Citations

20 A.3d 1187 (Pa. 2011)

Citing Cases

Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc.

2. Did the Superior Court err in its determination to expand the requirements for proof of highly reckless…

Reott v. Asia Trend, Inc.

2. Did the Superior Court err in its determination to expand the requirements for proof of highly reckless…