From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reno v. Doe

U.S.
Jun 24, 1996
518 U.S. 1014 (1996)

Summary

explaining that the determination of whether a given factor is present to an exceptional degree must be made by comparing the facts of other Guidelines cases

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Sweeting, Page 95

Opinion

No. 95-830.

June 24, 1996, October TERM, 1995.


C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Lane v. Peña, ante, p. 187. Reported below: 62 F. 3d 1424.


Summaries of

Reno v. Doe

U.S.
Jun 24, 1996
518 U.S. 1014 (1996)

explaining that the determination of whether a given factor is present to an exceptional degree must be made by comparing the facts of other Guidelines cases

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Sweeting, Page 95
Case details for

Reno v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:RENO, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES v. DOE, BY LAVERY, EXECUTOR OF…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 24, 1996

Citations

518 U.S. 1014 (1996)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Sweeting, Page 95

But in light of its decision in Koon, the Supreme Court vacated the court of appeals' judgment and remanded…

U.S. v. Mojica

The evidence at trial showed that Sandoval supplied drugs to Mojica, Hruza and Miranda who, in turn,…