From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Renner v. Court of Common Pleas

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Jul 2, 2019
216 A.3d 224 (Pa. 2019)

Opinion

No. 851 MAL 2018

07-02-2019

Michael RENNER, Petitioner v. The COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY, County of Lehigh, John J. Sikora and Mark Surovy, Respondents


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of July, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

(1) Did the Legislature intend for the Unified Judicial System to be within the definition of "employer" under the Pennsylvania Human Relations Law, and therefore abrogated its sovereign immunity as stated in the en banc decision in County of Allegheny v. Wilcox, 76 Pa.Cmwlth. 584, 465 A.2d 47 (1983)[?]
(2) Does the application of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act to the Unified Judicial System violate separation of powers so long as the Human Relations Commission neither investigates nor adjudicates the complaint of discrimination, as this Court held in Ct. of Com. Pleas of Erie County (6th Jud. Dist.), Juv. Probation Dept. v. Pennsylvania Human Rel. Commn., 546 Pa. 4, 682 A.2d 1246 (1996) and First Jud. Dist. of Pennsylvania v. Pennsylvania Human Rel. Comm'n., 556 Pa. 258, 727 A.2d 1110 (1999)?


Summaries of

Renner v. Court of Common Pleas

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Jul 2, 2019
216 A.3d 224 (Pa. 2019)
Case details for

Renner v. Court of Common Pleas

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL RENNER, Petitioner v. THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Jul 2, 2019

Citations

216 A.3d 224 (Pa. 2019)

Citing Cases

Renner v. Court of Common Pleas

We granted allocatur to consider two issues: first, whether the General Assembly intended for the Unified…