From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Renfroe v. Allstate Property Casualty Ins. Co.

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Oct 18, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-00359-CG-B (S.D. Ala. Oct. 18, 2010)

Summary

analyzing removal within 30 days of service under Pretka and holding that pre-suit demand, which included estimate of damages, supported removal

Summary of this case from Zabala v. Geovera Specialty Insurance Company

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-00359-CG-B.

October 18, 2010


ORDER


After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED as the opinion of this court. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand be DENIED. DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Renfroe v. Allstate Property Casualty Ins. Co.

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Oct 18, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-00359-CG-B (S.D. Ala. Oct. 18, 2010)

analyzing removal within 30 days of service under Pretka and holding that pre-suit demand, which included estimate of damages, supported removal

Summary of this case from Zabala v. Geovera Specialty Insurance Company
Case details for

Renfroe v. Allstate Property Casualty Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES RENFROE, Plaintiff, v. ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: Oct 18, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-00359-CG-B (S.D. Ala. Oct. 18, 2010)

Citing Cases

Zabala v. Geovera Specialty Insurance Company

Indeed, the cosmetic damages estimate, alone, is estimated at approximately $73,572.86. See Renfroe v.…

Vascular Ventures, LLC v. Am. Vascular Access, LLC

A removing defendant is not required "to prove the amount in controversy beyond all doubt or to banish all…