Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:15-cv-00090-GHD-RP
02-27-2017
RENASANT BANK PLAINTIFF v. ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANY DEFENDANT
ADDENDUM TO MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
To its February 21, 2017 memorandum opinion [225] granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff Renasant Bank's motion for partial summary judgment [195] and granting in its entirety Defendant St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company's motion for summary judgment [192], the Court adds as follows: The Court also considered pertinent to its analysis on the "improper financial benefit" proof requirement the fact that Plaintiff Renasant Bank did not bring a civil action against Wendy Hurt, its former employee, and further that there is no evidence in the record that a criminal prosecution was commenced against Hurt. For these reasons and all the other reasons stated in the Court's memorandum opinion [225], Plaintiff Renasant Bank failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact on the "improper financial benefit" issue.
SO ORDERED, this, the 27th day of February, 2017.
/s/_________
SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE