Summary
affirming district court order denying Plaintiff leave to file complaint pursuant to vexatious litigant order
Summary of this case from Remmert v. StaufferOpinion
No. 15-16471
11-07-2016
SHIRLEY VENOYA REMMERT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
D.C. No. 3:15-mc-80178-VC MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California
Vince G. Chhabria, District Judge, Presiding Before: LEAVY, GRABER, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Shirley Venoya Remmert appeals pro se from the district court's order denying her leave to file a complaint under a vexatious litigant order. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the application of a vexatious litigant order. Moy v. United States, 906 F.2d 467, 469 (9th Cir. 1990). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Remmert leave to file a complaint against defendants because Remmert attempted to file the complaint in violation of a vexatious litigant ordered entered against her. See id.
AFFIRMED.