From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reiss v. Davis

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Sep 15, 2011
No. CV 11-0523-PHX-SRB (ECV) (D. Ariz. Sep. 15, 2011)

Opinion

No. CV 11-0523-PHX-SRB (ECV).

September 15, 2011


ORDER


Pending before the court is Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Submit First Amended Complaint (Doc. 29). Defendants have filed a Response (Doc. 31) opposing Plaintiff's motion.

Plaintiff's motion to amend fails to comply with the requirements for such a motion set forth in the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 15.1 of the Local Rules requires a party who moves for leave to amend to attach a copy of the proposed amended pleading as an exhibit to the motion. The proposed pleading must "indicate in what respect it differs from the pleading which it amends, by bracketing or striking through the text to be deleted and underlining the text to be added." Id.

Here, although Plaintiff attached a copy of the proposed amended pleading to the motion, the proposed pleading does not indicate how it differs from the pleading which it amends. Having failed to comply with the requirements for seeking leave to amend his complaint, Plaintiff's motion will be denied.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

That Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Submit First Amended Complaint (Doc. 29) is DENIED.

DATED this 14th day of September, 2011.


Summaries of

Reiss v. Davis

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Sep 15, 2011
No. CV 11-0523-PHX-SRB (ECV) (D. Ariz. Sep. 15, 2011)
Case details for

Reiss v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:Richard Reiss, Plaintiff, v. Cary Davis, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Sep 15, 2011

Citations

No. CV 11-0523-PHX-SRB (ECV) (D. Ariz. Sep. 15, 2011)