From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reiniche v. Reiniche

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 6, 1991
579 So. 2d 210 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-2696.

April 24, 1991. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied June 6, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Broward County; John T. Luzzo, Judge.

Adam S. Doner of McGee, Jordan, Shuey, Gordon, Morris Doner, P.A., Lake Worth, for appellant.

Ross J. McKelvey, Jr., Pompano Beach, for appellee-Betty Reiniche.

John P. Seiler and John R. Gillespie, Jr., of Dykema Gossett, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee-Betty Jean Investments, Inc.


FASTRACK APPEAL


The husband raises two issues in his appeal from a final judgment in the parties' dissolution action, one of which we conclude to have merit. Accordingly, we affirm in part, reverse in part and remand with direction to proceed in accordance herewith.

The parties, married almost twenty years at the time of the dissolution, were in substantially different financial positions because of a prenuptial agreement. The husband has demonstrated an inability to pay his attorney's fees and costs and the wife's financially superior position.

We find that the trial court abused its discretion in awarding the husband only twenty-five percent of his attorney's fees, rather than requiring the wife to pay all of the husband's reasonable attorney's fees and costs. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1205 (Fla. 1980).

HERSEY, C.J., and GLICKSTEIN and STONE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Reiniche v. Reiniche

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 6, 1991
579 So. 2d 210 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Reiniche v. Reiniche

Case Details

Full title:MARVIN HAROLD REINICHE, APPELLANT, v. BETTY REINICHE AND BETTY JEAN…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 6, 1991

Citations

579 So. 2d 210 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)