From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reimann v. Stovall

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jun 23, 2016
No. 69716 (Nev. Jun. 23, 2016)

Opinion

No. 69716

06-23-2016

DANIELLE REIMANN, Appellant, v. LESLIE MARK STOVALL D/B/A STOVALL & ASSOCIATES, Respondent.


ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from a district court order adjudicating an attorney's lien. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Ronald J. Israel, Judge.

When our initial review of the docketing statement and documents submitted to this court revealed potential jurisdictional defects, we ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Specifically, it was not clear whether appellant was aggrieved by the challenged order and thus had standing to challenge it on appeal. See NRAP 3A(a) (allowing an appeal to be filed by an aggrieved party; Valley Bank of Nevada v. Ginsburg, 110 Nev. 440, 874 P.2d 729 (1994) (defining an aggrieved party). It also appeared that the notice of appeal was prematurely filed after the filing of a NRAP 4(a)(4) tolling motion seeking reconsideration but before that motion was formally resolved in a written order. See NRAP 4(a)(6); AA Primo Builders, LLC v. Washington, 126 Nev. 578, 245 P.3d 1190 (2010).

In response, appellant contends that she is aggrieved by the challenged order and that the motion for reconsideration was not a tolling motion. Appellant's motion for reconsideration was "in writing, timely filed, state[d] its grounds with particularity, and 'request[ed] a substantive alteration of the judgment, not merely the correction of a clerical error, or relief of a type wholly collateral to the judgment."' AA Primo, 126 Nev. at 585, 245 P.3d at 1195. The motion is thus accorded tolling effect pursuant to NRAP 4(a)(4)(C). Id. Accordingly, even assuming appellant is aggrieved by the challenged order and it is substantively appealable, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal was prematurely filed, see NRAP 4(a)(6), and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

/s/_________, J.

Douglas /s/_________, J.
Cherry /s/_________, J.
Gibbons cc: Hon. Ronald J. Israel, District Judge

Injury Lawyers of Nevada

Stovall & Associates

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Reimann v. Stovall

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jun 23, 2016
No. 69716 (Nev. Jun. 23, 2016)
Case details for

Reimann v. Stovall

Case Details

Full title:DANIELLE REIMANN, Appellant, v. LESLIE MARK STOVALL D/B/A STOVALL …

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Jun 23, 2016

Citations

No. 69716 (Nev. Jun. 23, 2016)