From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reik v. Reik

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 14, 1928
141 A. 921 (N.J. 1928)

Opinion

Decided May 14th, 1928.

On appeal from an order of the court of chancery.

Messrs. Cole Cole, for the respondent.

Messrs. Bourgeois Coulomb, for the appellant.


The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Ingersoll, and reported in 101 N.J. Eq. 523. For affirmance — THE CHIEF-JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Reik v. Reik

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 14, 1928
141 A. 921 (N.J. 1928)
Case details for

Reik v. Reik

Case Details

Full title:MARY WATSON REIK, respondent, v. HENRY O. REIK, appellant

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 14, 1928

Citations

141 A. 921 (N.J. 1928)
141 A. 921

Citing Cases

Roskein v. Roskein

Applying the Nevada law to the case at bar in the light of the federal mandate to give the Nevada decree the…

Reik v. Reik

This is an appeal from an order increasing the wife's maintenance. The original application was before this…