From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reihsen v. Burlingame Co.

Oregon Supreme Court
Nov 26, 1929
282 P. 554 (Or. 1929)

Opinion

Argued October 9, 1929

Affirmed November 26, 1929

From Multnomah: J.U. CAMPBELL, Judge.

For appellant there was a brief over the names of Messrs. Senn Recken, Messrs. Beach, Simon Greene and Mr. W.B. Shively with an oral argument by Mr. F.S. Senn.

For respondent there was a brief over the name of Messrs. Gallagher Conway with an oral argument by Mr. P.J. Gallagher.


IN BANK.

AFFIRMED.


This is a suit for rescission and a companion case to Sharkey v. The Burlingame Co. this day decided. The two cases were argued together and upon the same testimony. The facts are identical except as to the description of the property sold and the further fact that plaintiff did not solicit others to attend the lecture courses. The same rules were applicable to both cases and from this it follows that, since the decree in that case was affirmed, this should be and it is so ordered.

AFFIRMED.

BELT and BROWN, JJ., absent.

ROSSMAN, J., dissenting.


Summaries of

Reihsen v. Burlingame Co.

Oregon Supreme Court
Nov 26, 1929
282 P. 554 (Or. 1929)
Case details for

Reihsen v. Burlingame Co.

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE P. REIHSEN v. THE BURLINGAME CO

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Nov 26, 1929

Citations

282 P. 554 (Or. 1929)
282 P. 554