From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reid v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 5, 2023
No. A22A1206 (Ga. Ct. App. Jan. 5, 2023)

Opinion

A22A1206

01-05-2023

RYAN REID v. THE STATE


The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

Ryan Reid filed this direct appeal from an order of the trial court denying a post-conviction motion, which the trial court construed as a motion in arrest of judgment. For reasons that follow, the appeal is subject to dismissal.

The relevant facts show that, in 2017, Ryan Craig Reid pled guilty to one count of aggravated child molestation. Reid appealed his conviction, but the appeal was dismissed for failure to file a brief. See Case No. A17A1459 (May 17, 2017). In June 2018, the trial court entered an amended sentence to comply with the split sentence requirements of OCGA § 17-10-6.2 (b). In November 2021, Reid filed a pro se motion to dismiss his indictment, which the trial court construed as a motion in arrest of judgment. The trial court dismissed the motion, concluding that it was untimely. Reid appeals this ruling, seeking to challenge the June 2018 sentence. Reid also argues that the trial court erred in construing his November 2021 motion as one in arrest of judgment. According to Reid, he was alleging a void conviction. Reid's appeal is flawed for two reasons. First, Reid's attempt to appeal his amended sentence is untimely. A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the judgment or trial court order sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). "Compliance with this statutory deadline for filing a notice of appeal is an 'absolute requirement' to confer jurisdiction on an appellate court." Collier v. State, 307 Ga. 363, 371 (2) (834 S.E.2d 769) (2019) (citation omitted). Here, Reid filed his notice of appeal almost four years after entry of the sentencing order he seeks to appeal.

Reid was also charged with a second count of aggravated child molestation and one count of child molestation, but these charges were nol prossed.

A motion in arrest of judgment must be made "during the term at which the judgment was obtained." OCGA § 17-9-61 (b). See High v. State, 292 Ga. 544, 544 (739 S.E.2d 388) (2013). Reid's motion was not filed within the term at which the judgment was obtained, but three years later and was thus untimely. See OCGA § 156-3 (3) (The Atlanta Judicial Circuit terms of court begin the First Monday in January, March, May, July, September and November).

Second, construing Reid's November 2021 motion as a motion to vacate a void conviction does not entitle Reid to relief. The Supreme Court has made clear that a motion to vacate a judgment of conviction is not an appropriate remedy in a criminal case. See Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 218 (1) (686 S.E.2d 786) (2009). Accordingly, any appeal from an order denying such a motion must be dismissed. See id. at 218 (2); Roberts v. State, 286 Ga. 532, 532 (690 S.E.2d 150) (2010).

For these reasons, we lack jurisdiction to consider any argument Reid attempts to raise on appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Reid v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 5, 2023
No. A22A1206 (Ga. Ct. App. Jan. 5, 2023)
Case details for

Reid v. State

Case Details

Full title:RYAN REID v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jan 5, 2023

Citations

No. A22A1206 (Ga. Ct. App. Jan. 5, 2023)