From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reid v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 17, 2016
No. 69362 (Nev. App. May. 17, 2016)

Opinion

No. 69362

05-17-2016

RAFAEL ANTONIO REID, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction entered pursuant to a guilty plea of attempted sexual assault and robbery. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Michelle Leavitt, Judge.

Appellant Rafael Reid claims the district court abused its discretion by denying his presentence motion to withdraw guilty plea. A defendant may move to withdraw a guilty plea before sentencing, NRS 176.165, and "a district court may grant a defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea before sentencing for any reason where permitting withdrawal would be fair and just," Stevenson v. State, 131 Nev. ___, ___, 354 P.3d 1277, 1281 (2015). To this end, the Nevada Supreme Court recently disavowed the standard previously announced in Crawford v. State, 117 Nev. 718, 30 P.34 1123 (2001), which focused exclusively on whether the plea was knowing, voluntarily, and intelligently made, and affirmed that "the district court must consider the totality of the circumstances to determine whether permitting withdrawal of a guilty plea before sentencing would be fair and just." Stevenson, 131 Nev. at ___, 354 P.3d at 1281.

Reid claims he should have been able to withdraw his guilty plea because counsel failed to provide him with a copy of the SANE exam report prior to him pleading guilty. He claims this report contained potentially exculpatory evidence and he would not have pleaded guilty had he read the report. Reid fails to allege what this potentially exculpatory evidence was, provide this court with a copy of the SANE exam report, or provide this court with a transcript from the hearing on the motion to withdraw his guilty plea. As the appellant, it is Reid's burden to provide this court with an adequate record for review. See McConnell v. State, 125 Nev. 243, 256 n.13, 212 P.3d 307, 319 n.13 (2009). We conclude Reid fails to demonstrate the district court abused its discretion in denying the presentence motion to withdraw the guilty plea, and we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Gibbons

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Silver cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge

Sanft Law, P.C.

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Reid v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
May 17, 2016
No. 69362 (Nev. App. May. 17, 2016)
Case details for

Reid v. State

Case Details

Full title:RAFAEL ANTONIO REID, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: May 17, 2016

Citations

No. 69362 (Nev. App. May. 17, 2016)

Citing Cases

Reid v. State

Reid filed his petition more than two years after issuance of the remittitur on direct appeal on June 13,…