From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reid v. Goldman, Sachs Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 8, 1992
188 A.D.2d 350 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

December 8, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Walter M. Schackman, J.).


A registered securities representative who was required to sign a Form U-4 as a condition of employment can be compelled to arbitrate a State-based sex discrimination claim under the Federal Arbitration Act (see, Gilmer v Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp., 500 US ___, ___, n 2, 111 S Ct 1647, 1651-1652). As we recently held, the "decisions in Gilmer and post- Gilmer case law are controlling" and bind this Court to apply the Federal Arbitration Act as interpreted therein (Fletcher v Kidder, Peabody Co., 184 A.D.2d 359, 362).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.


Summaries of

Reid v. Goldman, Sachs Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 8, 1992
188 A.D.2d 350 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Reid v. Goldman, Sachs Co.

Case Details

Full title:RITA REID, Appellant, v. GOLDMAN, SACHS Co. et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 8, 1992

Citations

188 A.D.2d 350 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
590 N.Y.S.2d 497