From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reid Petroleum v. Boller's Auto Sales S

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 13, 1998
248 A.D.2d 1016 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

March 13, 1998

Appeal from order of the Supreme Court, Erie County, Notaro, J. — Disqualify Counsel.

Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Wisner, Callahan and Balio, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted plaintiff's motion to disqualify Linda Joseph, Esq., and Buchanan Ingersoll Professional Corporation (Buchanan Ingersoll) from representing defendants in this action. Joseph was employed in the litigation department of Jaeckle, Fleischmann Mugel, L. L. P. (Jaeckle Fleischmann), while that firm represented plaintiff in this action. Although there is no proof that Joseph performed any work on behalf of plaintiff, she also served as administrator of the litigation department for approximately nine months before leaving Jaeckle Fleischmann to become a managing partner at Buchanan Ingersoll. As administrator, she received monthly reports on litigation in progress, including the subject case, and supervised the preparation of cases for trial. Although Joseph does not recall reading any report concerning this matter or conversing with other members of the firm about the matter, defendants have failed to show that there is no "reasonable possibility" that she did not acquire confidential information about the matter while employed at Jaeckle Fleischmann (Solow v. Grace Co., 83 N.Y.2d 303, 313). Under the circumstances, Joseph's continued representation of defendants in the same action would present the appearance of impropriety.


Summaries of

Reid Petroleum v. Boller's Auto Sales S

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 13, 1998
248 A.D.2d 1016 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Reid Petroleum v. Boller's Auto Sales S

Case Details

Full title:REID PETROLEUM CORPORATION, Respondent, v. BOLLER'S AUTO SALES AND…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 13, 1998

Citations

248 A.D.2d 1016 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
670 N.Y.S.2d 152

Citing Cases

562 Eglinton, Inc. v. Merlo

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs' cross motion to disqualify the law firm representing…