From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reichel v. Katz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 18, 1965
23 A.D.2d 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Opinion

May 18, 1965


Judgment unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, to the extent of vacating the verdict in favor of plaintiff Edith Reichel in the sum of $20,172 and granting a new trial as to defendants-appellants Irving Katz and Rose Rosa, and, as so modified, affirmed, with $50 costs to defendants-appellants, unless plaintiff stipulates to accept $12,500 in lieu of the award by verdict, in which event the judgment is modified to that extent, and is affirmed as thus modified, with $50 costs to defendants-appellants. In this personal injury action it is evident that the jury verdict is grossly excessive in its award of damages, and that a verdict in excess of $12,500 is not warranted by the record.

Concur — Botein, P.J., Eager and Steuer, JJ.; Rabin and McNally, JJ., dissent, in part, and vote to reverse and dismiss the complaint against defendant-appellant Rose Rosa on the ground that the record fails to establish actionable negligence as to her. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Reichel v. Katz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 18, 1965
23 A.D.2d 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)
Case details for

Reichel v. Katz

Case Details

Full title:EDITH REICHEL, Respondent-Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v. IRVING KATZ et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 18, 1965

Citations

23 A.D.2d 834 (N.Y. App. Div. 1965)

Citing Cases

Wicks v. Henken

See, e.g., Engman v. City of Des Moines, 255 Iowa 1039, 125 N.W.2d 235 (1963) (jury award of $25,000 to…