From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Regalado v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Jan 9, 2013
No. 04-12-00742-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 9, 2013)

Opinion

No. 04-12-00742-CR

01-09-2013

Eduardo REGALADO, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee


MEMORANDUM OPINION


From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CR11016

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
DISMISSED

Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant Eduardo Regalado pled nolo contendere to the offense of possession of a controlled substance in an amount less than one gram. The trial court imposed sentence and signed a certificate stating that this "is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal." See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). After appellant timely filed a notice of appeal, the clerk sent copies of the certification and notice of appeal to this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(e). The clerk's record, which includes the plea bargain agreement and the trial court's Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

The clerk's record establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). After reviewing the clerk's record, the trial court's certification therefore appears to accurately reflect that this is a plea bargain case and appellant does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk's record to determine whether trial court's certification is accurate). This court must dismiss an appeal "if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record." TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

On November 27, 2012, we gave appellant notice that the appeal would be dismissed unless an amended trial court certification showing he has the right to appeal has been made part of the appellate record by December 27, 2012. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet. ref'd) (not designated for publication). An amended certification showing appellant has the right to appeal has not been filed. We therefore dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH


Summaries of

Regalado v. State

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Jan 9, 2013
No. 04-12-00742-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Regalado v. State

Case Details

Full title:Eduardo REGALADO, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Jan 9, 2013

Citations

No. 04-12-00742-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 9, 2013)