From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reeves v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Feb 13, 2013
No. 05-12-01142-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 13, 2013)

Opinion

No. 05-12-01142-CV

02-13-2013

MICHAEL REEVES, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


DISMISSED and Opinion Filed February 13, 2013.

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-09485


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Moseley, Francis, and Lang

Opinion by Justice Moseley

By letter dated December 10, 2012, the Court questioned its jurisdiction over this appeal. Specifically, it appears the order appealed is not reviewable by direct appeal. The Court requested that appellant file, within ten days, a jurisdictional brief explaining how this Court has jurisdiction over the appeal with an opportunity for appellee to respond. As of today's date, appellant has not filed a jurisdictional brief.

A person who has been declared a vexatious litigant must seek permission to file a litigation. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 11.102(a) (West Supp. 2012). A decision by a local administrative judge denying a litigant permission to file a litigation is not grounds for appeal. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 11.102(c) (West Supp. 2012). A vexatious litigant who is denied permission to file a litigation may apply for a writ of mandamus within thirty days of the decision. Id.

Appellant has been declared a vexatious litigant. He appeals from the August 15, 2012 decision of the local administrative judge denying him permission to file a litigation. Such order is not grounds for appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

________________________

JIM MOSELEY

JUSTICE
121142F.P05

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL REEVES, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee No. 05-12-01142-CV

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No, DC-12-09485.

Opinion delivered by Justice Moseley,

Justices Francis and Lang, participating.

In accordance with this Court's opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee, the State of Texas, recover its costs of the appeal from appellant, Michael Reeves. Judgment entered this 13 day of February, 2013.

________________________

JIM MOSELEY

JUSTICE


Summaries of

Reeves v. State

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Feb 13, 2013
No. 05-12-01142-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 13, 2013)
Case details for

Reeves v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL REEVES, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Feb 13, 2013

Citations

No. 05-12-01142-CV (Tex. App. Feb. 13, 2013)

Citing Cases

In re Solis

Relator filed a "Motion to Direct Trial Court to Institute Contempt of Court Proceedings Against District…

Parker v. McLaurin

Therefore, because appellant may not appeal the local administrative judge's order and did not apply for a…