From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reeves v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Nov 2, 2010
Civil No. 09-059-JE (D. Or. Nov. 2, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-059-JE.

November 2, 2010


ORDER


Magistrate Judge John Jelderks filed his Findings and Recommendation on October 12, 2010. The matter is now before me.See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R. Civ P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. See § 636(b)(1)(C); Simpson v. Lear Astronics Corp., 77 F.3d 1170, 1174-75 (9th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Jelderks' Findings and Recommendation #37. Plaintiff's application for an award of EAJA fees (#34) is GRANTED in part; plaintiff is awarded fees in the amount of $9,882.68.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 2 day of November, 2010.


Summaries of

Reeves v. Astrue

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Nov 2, 2010
Civil No. 09-059-JE (D. Or. Nov. 2, 2010)
Case details for

Reeves v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JAMES W. REEVES, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division

Date published: Nov 2, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 09-059-JE (D. Or. Nov. 2, 2010)