From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reese v. U.S.

U.S.
May 16, 2011
563 U.S. 990 (2011)

Summary

applying intermediate scrutiny to federal statute prohibiting an individual's possession of gun—even in the home—when subject to a protective order as opposed to a criminal conviction

Summary of this case from Maloney v. Singas

Opinion

No. 10–1268.

05-16-2011

James Oliver REESE, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.


Summaries of

Reese v. U.S.

U.S.
May 16, 2011
563 U.S. 990 (2011)

applying intermediate scrutiny to federal statute prohibiting an individual's possession of gun—even in the home—when subject to a protective order as opposed to a criminal conviction

Summary of this case from Maloney v. Singas

applying intermediate scrutiny to statute prohibiting gun possession—even in the home—for those who have an outstanding order of protection as opposed to a criminal conviction

Summary of this case from N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. City of N.Y.

applying intermediate scrutiny and upholding statute that precludes those subject to abuse prevention order from having firearms

Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. Adams
Case details for

Reese v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES O. REESE v. UNITED STATES

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 16, 2011

Citations

563 U.S. 990 (2011)
131 S. Ct. 2476
179 L. Ed. 2d 1214

Citing Cases

State v. DiCiccio

istrict of Columbia, supra, 670 F.3d at 1261 (challenge to semiautomatic rifle and large capacity magazine…

Powell v. Tompkins

of either intermediate scrutiny or strict scrutiny). See, e.g., Jackson v. City and County of San Francisco,…