Opinion
Case No. 11-COA-053
05-11-2012
KIMBERLY J. REESE Plaintiff-Appellee v. MICHAEL A. MECHLING, ET AL. Defendants-Appellants
For Plaintiff-Appellee STEVEN J. BRIAN Brian Law Offices For Defendants-Appellants JOYCE V. KIMBLER For Wayne Mutual Insurance Company EDWARD A. DARK
JUDGES:
Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, P.J.
Hon. William B. Hoffman, J.
Hon. John W. Wise, J.
OPINION
CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Appeal from the Ashland County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 11-CIV-345
JUDGMENT: Reversed and Remanded
DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: May 11, 2012
APPEARANCES:
For Plaintiff-Appellee
STEVEN J. BRIAN
Brian Law Offices
For Defendants-Appellants
JOYCE V. KIMBLER
For Wayne Mutual Insurance Company
EDWARD A. DARK
Hoffman , J.
{¶1} Defendants-appellants Michael A. Mechling, et al., appeal the November 18, 2011 Judgment Entry entered by the Ashland County Court of Common Pleas denying their Motion to Bifurcate. Plaintiff-appellee is Kimberly J. Reese.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
A rendition of the facts is unnecessary for our resolution of this appeal.
{¶2} Appellee sued Appellants for injuries alleged to have resulted from Appellant Michael Mechling's operation of his vehicle. Appellee was a passenger in the vehicle. Appellee sought both compensatory and punitive damages.
{¶3} Appellants filed a Motion to Bifurcate the issue of punitive damages pursuant to R.C. 2315.21. On November 18, 2011, the trial court overruled the motion.
{¶4} It is from that entry Appellants prosecute this appeal, assigning as error:
{¶5} "I. THE TRIAL COURT COMMITTED REVERSIBLE ERROR WHEN IT DENIED APPELLANT'S MOTION TO BIFURCATE PLAINTIFF'S PUNITIVE DAMAGES CLAIM PURSUANT TO §R.C.2315.21(B)."
{¶6} The trial court overruled Appellant's Motion to Bifurcate based upon this Court's ruling in Plaugher v. Oniala, 2011 Ohio 1207. In Plaugher, this Court found R.C. 2315.21(B) to be unconstitutional.
{¶7} Subsequent to the trial court's decision and while this appeal was pending, the Ohio Supreme Court decided Havel v. Villa St. Joseph, 2012-Ohio-552. Therein, the Supreme Court specifically found R.C. 2315.21(B) does not violate the Ohio Constitution. Id, syllabus 1.
{¶8} Based upon Havel, Appellants' assignment of error is sustained.
{¶9} The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case remanded to that court for further proceedings. By: Hoffman, J. Delaney, P.J. and Wise, J. concur
________________
HON. WILLIAM B. HOFFMAN
________________
HON. PATRICIA A. DELANEY
________________
HON. JOHN W. WISE
KIMBERLY J. REESE Plaintiff-Appellee
-vs
MICHAEL A. MECHLING, ET AL. Defendants-Appellants
JUDGMENT ENTRY
Case No. 11-COA-053
For the reasons stated in our accompanying Opinion, the judgment of the Ashland County Court is reversed and this matter is remanded to that court for further proceedings in accordance with our Opinion and the law. Costs to Appellee.
________________
HON. WILLIAM B. HOFFMAN
________________
HON. PATRICIA A. DELANEY
________________
HON. JOHN W. WISE