From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reese v. Hughes

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 13, 2016
No. 66436 (Nev. App. Dec. 13, 2016)

Opinion

No. 66436

12-13-2016

ELIJAH REESE, Appellant, v. BRITNIE NICOLE HUGHES, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is an appeal from a district court order regarding child custody. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Vincent Ochoa, Judge.

Following an evidentiary hearing, the district court entered an order awarding Respondent, Britnie, primary physical custody of the parties' two minor children and approving her relocation with the minor children to Texas. On September 27, 2016 this court entered an Order of Limited Remand directing the district court to clarify its findings regarding the allegations of domestic violence and child abduction. In response, the district court filed an Addendum to Decision including additional findings of fact and conclusions of law.

We do not recount the facts except as necessary to our disposition.

This court reviews a child custody decision for an abuse of discretion. Wallace v. Wallace, 112 Nev. 1015, 1019, 922 P.2d 541, 542 (1996). In making a child custody determination, "the sole consideration of the court is the best interest of the child." NRS 125.480(1) (2009).

In 2015, the Legislature repealed NRS 125.480 and amended NRS Chapter 125C to include similar provisions. See A.B. 263, § 8, 78th Leg. (Nev. 2015). --------

In its Decision and Addendum to Decision, the district court made findings regarding the children's best interests and concluded that "[t]here was no clear and convincing evidence of domestic violence as required by NRS 125C.230 and thus the domestic violence presumption does not apply to either party." The district court also concluded that "despite Mom's failure to follow the proper procedure for her relocation, her conduct did not constitute an act of abduction under NRS 125C.240 or NRS 200.359."

Taking all of the findings of fact and conclusions of law into consideration, we cannot say the district court abused its discretion in determining insufficient evidence existed to support the allegations of domestic violence and child abduction, or in declining to apply a rebuttable presumption against either party. We also cannot conclude that the district court erred in, awarding Britnie primary physical custody and granting her request for relocation to Texas.

We therefore,

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Gibbons /s/_________, J.
Tao /s/_________, J.
Silver cc: Hon. Vincent Ochoa, District Judge

Gerrard Cox & Larsen

McFarling Law Group

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Reese v. Hughes

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 13, 2016
No. 66436 (Nev. App. Dec. 13, 2016)
Case details for

Reese v. Hughes

Case Details

Full title:ELIJAH REESE, Appellant, v. BRITNIE NICOLE HUGHES, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Dec 13, 2016

Citations

No. 66436 (Nev. App. Dec. 13, 2016)