From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reek v. Reek

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 6, 1974
303 So. 2d 677 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

Opinion

No. 74-363.

December 6, 1974.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, J. William Woodson, J.

Joseph M. Murasko, Fern Park, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.


Upon review of the record, appellant's brief and appendix, the appellee having failed to provide this court with brief and appendix, and examination of the transcript of testimony before the trial court, it appears there was no evidence introduced on the issue of attorneys' fees. Therefore, the chancellor erred in awarding attorneys' fees to the appellee. See Goldblatt v. Goldblatt, 277 So.2d 34 (Fla.App. 1973); Cardillo v. Cardillo, 269 So.2d 773 (Fla. App. 1972); Thoni v. Thoni, 179 So.2d 420 (Fla.App. 1965); Lyle v. Lyle, 167 So.2d 256 (Fla.App. 1964). Accordingly, the award of attorneys' fees is reversed and the cause remanded for the purpose of taking of testimony on the issue of attorneys' fees. In all other respects, the order appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed in part, and reversed in part and remanded with directions.

OWEN, C.J., and CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Reek v. Reek

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 6, 1974
303 So. 2d 677 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)
Case details for

Reek v. Reek

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK JOSEPH REEK, APPELLANT, v. CAROLL MANELVIA REEK, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 6, 1974

Citations

303 So. 2d 677 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1974)

Citing Cases

Segal v. Segal

The well established law is that a chancellor may not make an award of attorney's fees without the…

Guy v. Guy

Upon review of the record it appears there was no evidence introduced on the issue of attorneys' fees.…