From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug 16, 2011
345 S.W.3d 401 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)

Opinion

No. ED 95323.

2011-08-16

Courtland REED, Appellant,v.STATE of Missouri, Respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Joan Moriarty, Judge.Brocca Smith, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., James B. Farnsworth, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Courtland Reed appeals from a judgment in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post conviction relief. We have reviewed

the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Reed v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.
Aug 16, 2011
345 S.W.3d 401 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)
Case details for

Reed v. State

Case Details

Full title:Courtland REED, Appellant,v.STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One.

Date published: Aug 16, 2011

Citations

345 S.W.3d 401 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)