From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. State

Supreme Court of Indiana
Nov 10, 1982
441 N.E.2d 441 (Ind. 1982)

Opinion

No. 981S267.

November 10, 1982.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Marion County, Patricia J. Gifford, J.

Michael R. Franceschini, Steers, Sullivan, McNamar Rogers, Indianapolis, for appellant.

Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen., Stephan E. Wolter, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for appellee.


This cause is now before us upon the statement of aggravated circumstances filed September 21, 1982, by the Trial Court in compliance with our remand for a more complete statement of reasons for the enhancement of the sentence, as required by Kern v. State, (1981) Ind., 426 N.E.2d 385, Reed v. State, (1982) Ind., 438 N.E.2d 704.

In its supplementary statement the trial court specifically finds that the defendant has previously been convicted three times of Burglary and three times of violating the 1935 Firearms Act. Consequently, we may now consider the reasonableness of the sentence in light of Defendant's record of criminal activity and the asserted need for rehabilitative treatment that can be best provided by commitment to a penal facility as previously found by the trial court.

The sentence imposed upon the defendant is not manifestly unreasonable in light of Defendant's history of criminal activity, notwithstanding that the aforementioned prior convictions occurred in 1959 through 1972. Indiana Appellate Review of Sentences Rule 2.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in its entirety.

GIVAN, C.J., and DeBRULER, HUNTER and PIVARNIK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Reed v. State

Supreme Court of Indiana
Nov 10, 1982
441 N.E.2d 441 (Ind. 1982)
Case details for

Reed v. State

Case Details

Full title:RALPH REED, APPELLANT (DEFENDANT BELOW), v. STATE OF INDIANA, APPELLEE…

Court:Supreme Court of Indiana

Date published: Nov 10, 1982

Citations

441 N.E.2d 441 (Ind. 1982)

Citing Cases

Richardson v. State

Ind. Code § 35-4.1-4-7(c)(2) (35-50-1A-7(c)(2) (Burns 1979)). In this case the trial court has set out…