From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Reed

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 18, 1971
244 So. 2d 449 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

Opinion

No. N-118.

February 18, 1971.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County, Thomas D. Beasley, J.

John M. Coe, of Coe Coe, Pensacola, for appellant.

Walter J. Smith, of Smith, Tolton Wolff, Ft. Walton Beach, for appellee.


Appellant seeks review of a final judgment in a divorce suit, the issue herein being the failure to award alimony to appellant. This matter has been before the court earlier at which time we entered our decision remanding the case for further action. Said decision is reported at 226 So.2d 114.

Upon consideration of the record on appeal, the briefs and the arguments of counsel, it is our view that there is a sufficient evidentiary showing of a likelihood that appellee's financial circumstances will materially improve hereafter, thus enabling him to make alimony payments to appellant in the future. Alternatively, the circumstances of appellant may be so changed in the future as to justify or require the award of alimony payments in the event of such change. In order to enable the court below to consider an application for alimony by appellant in the event of changing circumstances by either party, the judgment reviewed in this appeal is hereby amended so as to expressly retain jurisdiction of this cause for future award of alimony upon proper showing.

Except as modified by retaining jurisdiction in accordance with the above, the order appealed is

Affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C.J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Reed v. Reed

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 18, 1971
244 So. 2d 449 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)
Case details for

Reed v. Reed

Case Details

Full title:FRANCES G. REED, APPELLANT, v. ERNEST L. REED, JR., APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 18, 1971

Citations

244 So. 2d 449 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)

Citing Cases

O'Brien v. O'Brien

The rule, generally, is that where there is a likelihood of a change in circumstances in the future that…

MUMM v. MUMM

We find merit in only one point raised on appeal, to-wit: the chancellor erred in failing to retain…