From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Pugh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Feb 5, 2020
Case No. 19-CV-1792 (NEB/BRT) (D. Minn. Feb. 5, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 19-CV-1792 (NEB/BRT)

02-05-2020

RONALD REED, Petitioner, v. JESSE PUGH, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has received the November 21, 2019 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson. [ECF No. 5.] No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 5] is ACCEPTED; 2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [ECF No. 1] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 3. No certificate of appealability be issued. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: February 5, 2020

BY THE COURT:

s/Nancy E. Brasel

Nancy E. Brasel

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Reed v. Pugh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Feb 5, 2020
Case No. 19-CV-1792 (NEB/BRT) (D. Minn. Feb. 5, 2020)
Case details for

Reed v. Pugh

Case Details

Full title:RONALD REED, Petitioner, v. JESSE PUGH, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Feb 5, 2020

Citations

Case No. 19-CV-1792 (NEB/BRT) (D. Minn. Feb. 5, 2020)