From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

REED v. OSP

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 27, 1974
526 P.2d 644 (Or. Ct. App. 1974)

Opinion

No. 3295, 02-74-042

Argued August 20, 1974

Affirmed September 23, 1974 Reconsideration denied October 30, 1974 Petition for review denied December 27, 1974

Judicial Review of disciplinary order of the Superintendent of Oregon State Penitentiary.

John K. Hoover, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

Scott McAlister, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Attorney General, and W. Michael Gillette, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before SCHWAB, Chief Judge, and FOLEY and TANZER, Judges.


AFFIRMED.


The issues presented in this prison discipline case have all been resolved in Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 94 S Ct 2963, 41 L Ed 2d 935 (1974), Bonney v. OSP, 16 Or. App. 509, 519 P.2d 383, Sup Ct review allowed (1974), Dragoo v. OSP, 19 Or. App. 1, 526 P.2d 637 (1974), and Smith v. OSP, 18 Or. App. 668, 526 P.2d 642 (1974).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

REED v. OSP

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 27, 1974
526 P.2d 644 (Or. Ct. App. 1974)
Case details for

REED v. OSP

Case Details

Full title:LEO DANBY REED, JR., Petitioner, v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, Respondent

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 27, 1974

Citations

526 P.2d 644 (Or. Ct. App. 1974)
526 P.2d 644