Reed v. Marshall

Full title: CHARLES REED, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: Apr 5, 2011

CV 09-8886-VBF (PLA) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2011)

Opinion

CHARLES REED, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 09-8886-VBF (PLA) United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. April 5, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

          VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, petitioner's objections, and petitioner's amendment to the objections. The Court agrees with the recommendations of the magistrate judge.

         ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED:

         1. The report and recommendation is adopted.

         2. Judgment shall be entered consistent with this order.

         3. The clerk shall serve this order and the judgment on all counsel or parties of record.