From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Great Western Bank

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Aug 4, 2008
CASE NO. 8:08CV245 (D. Neb. Aug. 4, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO. 8:08CV245.

August 4, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Defendant Great Western Bank's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Filing No. 6). The Plaintiff, Charles Reed, filed an Amended Complaint on August 1, 2008 (Filing No. 10). The Amended Complaint is permitted "as a matter of course" under Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a)(1)(A), because the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is not a "responsive pleading." See Fed.R.Civ.P. 7(a); Winfrey v. Brewer, 570 F.2d 761, 764 n. 4 (8th Cir. 1978). Accordingly, the Motion to Dismiss will be denied as moot.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Defendant Great Western Bank's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Filing No. 6) is denied as moot; and
2. The Defendant Great Western Bank will respond to the Plaintiff's Amended Complaint in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 12.


Summaries of

Reed v. Great Western Bank

United States District Court, D. Nebraska
Aug 4, 2008
CASE NO. 8:08CV245 (D. Neb. Aug. 4, 2008)
Case details for

Reed v. Great Western Bank

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES REED, Plaintiff, v. GREAT WESTERN BANK, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Aug 4, 2008

Citations

CASE NO. 8:08CV245 (D. Neb. Aug. 4, 2008)