From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Edwards

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Nov 27, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-558-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Nov. 27, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-558-JJB-SCR

11-27-2012

MARIE MARCEL REED, (PRO SE) v. MIKE EDWARDS, OFFICER OF THE BATON ROUGE POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET AL.


RULING

The court has carefully considered the petition, the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephen C. Riedlinger dated October 3, 2012 (doc. no. 3). The plaintiff filed an objection which essentially makes the same arguments and has been duly considered by the court.

The court hereby approves the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and adopts it as the court's opinion herein. Accordingly, the plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(l) as frivolous and malicious, and without leave to amend because there is no conceivable, non-frivolous, non-malicious federal claim she could assert consistent with the facts alleged in her complaint, as amended.

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 27th day of November, 2012.

_____________

JAMES J. BRADY, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA


Summaries of

Reed v. Edwards

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Nov 27, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-558-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Nov. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Reed v. Edwards

Case Details

Full title:MARIE MARCEL REED, (PRO SE) v. MIKE EDWARDS, OFFICER OF THE BATON ROUGE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Nov 27, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-558-JJB-SCR (M.D. La. Nov. 27, 2012)