Opinion
Civil Action No. 4:02CV287.
March 14, 2006
ORDER
This cause is before the Court on the municipal defendants' Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissable Expert Witness Testimony [185-1]. The Court, having reviewed the motion, the response, the authorities cited and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, finds as follows, to-wit:
That the motion should be granted in part and denied in part as set forth below:
Dr. Clyde Glenn:
Page 29, line 17 through page 30, line 11 — Denied
Dr. Henry Flautt, Jr.
Page 19, line 13 through page 20, line 3 — Denied
Elizabeth L. Rhea
Page 6, lines 2-12 — Granted
Page 14, lines 6-20 — Granted
Page 28, line 19 through page 29, line 16 — Granted
Page 30, lines 1-15 — Granted
Page 31, line 18 through page 32, line 15 — Granted
Dr. Ronald Braswell
Page 7, lines 4-5 — Granted
Page 8, line 17 through page 9, line 11 — Denied
Page 30, lines 6-14 — Granted
Page 34, line 8 through page 36, line 7 — Denied
The instant ruling as to Dr. Lewis' designated testimony is intended to convey the Court's ruling only as to the issues raised by the instant motion; it in no way reflects on the merits of the plaintiff's pending Motion in Limine to Limit Testimony of Dr. Adam Lewis and Other Testimony Related Thereto.
Page 26, line 22 through page 27, line 3 — Denied
Page 27, lines 7-9 — Denied
Page 27, lines 12-15 — Denied
Page 27, lines 19-21 — Denied
Page 36, line 18 through page 38, line 3 — Denied as to Page 36, line 18 through page 37, line 5; granted as to Page 37, line 6 through page 38, line 3
Page 38, lines 17-21 — Granted
Page 38, lines 23 through page 40, line 1 — Granted
Page 40, lines 9-11 — Granted
Page 40, lines 13-14 — Granted
Page 40, line 20 through page 43, line 7 — Denied as to Page 40, line 20 through page 42, line 9; granted as to Page 42, line 10 through page 43, line 7
Page 43, lines 12-19 — Granted
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the municipal defendants' Motion in Limine to Exclude Inadmissable Expert Witness Testimony [185-1] should be, and hereby is, GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as set forth above.
SO ORDERED.