From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Cigna Ins.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
Sep 17, 2012
Case No: 3:12-CV-00769 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 17, 2012)

Opinion

Case No: 3:12-CV-00769

09-17-2012

KAREN & RYAN REED, Plaintiff, v. CIGNA INSURANCE Defendants.


U.S. Magistrate Judge


Judge Campbell


Magistrate Judge Knowles


MOTION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Comes now the Plaintiff, KAREN & RYAN REED, by and through counsel, and moves this honorable court to continue the initial case management conference for September 17, 2012. In support, Plaintiff would state as follows:

1. In house counsel for the Defendant has contacted counsel for the Plaintiffs and the parties are attempting to negotiate a settlement to this matter.

2. Plaintiff agreed, at the request of Defendant, they would not object should Defendant require an extra 30 days in which to file an answer.

3. Plaintiff, at the request of the Defendant, agreed they would ask this honorable court to continue this initial case management conference in hopes the matter could be resolved without further litigation.

Wherefore, Plaintiffs respectfully request this honorable court continue the initial case management conference currently set for approximately 30 days.


Summaries of

Reed v. Cigna Ins.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
Sep 17, 2012
Case No: 3:12-CV-00769 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Reed v. Cigna Ins.

Case Details

Full title:KAREN & RYAN REED, Plaintiff, v. CIGNA INSURANCE Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

Date published: Sep 17, 2012

Citations

Case No: 3:12-CV-00769 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 17, 2012)