From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Nichlos

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION
Aug 24, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-108-GHD-DAS (N.D. Miss. Aug. 24, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-108-GHD-DAS

08-24-2018

RAY REED PLAINTIFF v. CHIEF NICHLOS AND STARKVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT DEFENDANTS


FINAL JUDGMENT ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

United States Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders issued a report and recommendation on June 13, 2018, recommending that the complaint in this cause be dismissed as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(i). While an acknowledgement of receipt was mailed to Reed that same day, Reed has failed to execute that acknowledgment. Reed has not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation, and the time for doing so has long since expired.

Where no objections to a Report and Recommendation are filed, a "Court need only satisfy itself that there is no plain error on the face of the record." Gauthier v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 644 F.Supp.2d 824, 828 (E.D. Tex. 2009). This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and found no plain error.

Accordingly, it ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation [5] is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court;

2. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED as frivolous, counting as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

SO ORDERED this the 24th day of August, 2018.

/s/_________

SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Reed v. Nichlos

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION
Aug 24, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-108-GHD-DAS (N.D. Miss. Aug. 24, 2018)
Case details for

Reed v. Nichlos

Case Details

Full title:RAY REED PLAINTIFF v. CHIEF NICHLOS AND STARKVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 24, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-108-GHD-DAS (N.D. Miss. Aug. 24, 2018)