From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Berry Network, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Apr 11, 2013
Case No. 3:13-cv-035 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 11, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:13-cv-035

04-11-2013

SHARON K. REED, Plaintiff, v. BERRY NETWORK, INC., a division of AT&T Communications, nka Berry Network, LLC and AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO. 1: c/o AT&T Integrated Disability Service Center and SEDGWICK CLAIM MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. and HEWITT ASSOCIATES, LLC, Defendants.


JUDGE: HERBERT RICE

MAGISTRATE: JUDGE MICHAEL R.

MERZ


ORDER GRANTING

MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE ATTORNEY TO ACT AS TRIAL COUNSEL

This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Pro Hac Vice Attorney to Act as Trial Counsel filed by Defendants. The Court, having examined said Motion and being duly advised, hereby GRANTS same.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Eric P. Mathisen is granted leave to act as trial counsel in this matter, participate in hearings and conferences, and sign pleadings without Attorney Seidler.

______________________________

JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRIBUTION: Robert F. Seidler
robert.seidler@ogletreedeakins.com
Eric P. Mathisen
eric.matmsen@ogletreedeakins.com
Gary J. Leppla
gjleppla@LepLaw.com
Philip J. Leppla
pileppla@LepLaw.com


Summaries of

Reed v. Berry Network, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Apr 11, 2013
Case No. 3:13-cv-035 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Reed v. Berry Network, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SHARON K. REED, Plaintiff, v. BERRY NETWORK, INC., a division of AT&T…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Apr 11, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:13-cv-035 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 11, 2013)